Hi, Iām Nicola from The People Mentor and welcome to another episode of my series. I was scrolling through a management forum last week when I came across something that made me stop in my tracks. A leader asked for advice on bringing just one person from their remote team back into the office.
Everyone else would continue working from home. And the reason it made sense on paper was that this team member had become detached, wasnāt responding quickly, and was entirely out of sync with everyone else. The leader generally thought that the person being in the office a couple of days a week would help rebuild that connection.
But you could already see the problem brewing.
Fairness.
Because the moment one person is treated differently, every conversation afterwards carries this hidden tension. People start wondering whatās really going on. They question your motives. And once fairness gets questioned? Trust doesnāt hang around for long.
Iāve seen this play out so many times in my work with leaders, and honestly, it never gets easier to watch.
And then hereās something to surprise you: according to the Chartered Management Institute, 80% of managers have had absolutely no formal training on how to handle difficult conversations. No. If you are feeling out of your depth in these discussions, you are not alone.
So if youāre feeling out of your depth with these discussions? Youāre not alone. Youāre actually in the majority.
Today, I want to talk about how to handle these return-to-workplace conversations when fairness is on the line, how to keep trust intact, and how to actually lead people through change rather than just managing them through it.
The Bit That Nobody Wants to Talk About-Handling the Tough Return Conversation
Right, so the leader in that forum post had good intentions. He was genuinely trying to strengthen his team. But the conversation landed all wrong.
Not because of what he said, but because of how it felt.
When it comes to returning to the workplace, feelings drive way more behaviour than logic ever will. I donāt care how reasonable your argument is ā if it doesnāt land right emotionally, youāre fighting a losing battle.
I read a Reddit post recently where a manager said, āIām torn. I love the energy of being together, but forcing someone back risks losing talent.ā
Another one added: āItās not about productivity anymore. It feels like control.ā
Those short comments? They say absolutely everything about what youāre up against right now as a leader.
The second fairness comes into question; people donāt just resist the change. They question YOU. Your motives. Your integrity. Your leadership.
Because when a decision feels uneven, it rarely matters how logical it is. What matters is how it lands.
Why Fairness Feels So Fragile
Hereās the thing about fairness ā itās not about treating everyone exactly the same.
Itās about everyone feeling seen and considered. Thereās a massive difference.
Fairness is also incredibly fragile, and emotion plays a huge part in how we perceive it.
We pick up on tone, micro-expressions, and body language faster than we process actual words. A tiny shift in your voice or a flicker across your face can completely change how someone hears you.
The science calls this emotional contagion ā itās the way emotions ripple out through a team, even when nobody says a word out loud.
If youāve ever walked into a room and instantly felt the tension? Thatās it in action.
So when you open a conversation about changing someoneās working pattern, your emotional energy sets the entire tone before youāve even finished your first sentence.
If itās coming from a place of frustration, theyāll feel defensive immediately.
If itās coming from genuine curiosity and care, the exact same message lands completely differently.
This is why managing your own emotional state before you start these conversations is absolutely essential. Because if your emotional brain takes over ā that instinctive, protective part of you thatās wired for threat ā logic disappears out the window.
And if youāre emotionally flooded, guess what? They will be too.
Understanding Whatās Really Happening Under the Surface
Before we get into the conversation itself, I want you to understand something crucial about whatās actually happening when emotions run high in these discussions.
When someone reacts strongly to a return-to-office conversation, theyāre not just responding to logistics. Their emotional reaction is telling you something important ā itās signalling that a fundamental need isnāt being met.
Negative emotions are messengers. Theyāre your brainās way of saying, āPay attention, something important is at risk here.ā
When that team member hears āyou need to come back to the office,ā their brain might be screaming about unmet needs for autonomy, trust, or security. Maybe itās threatening their need for balance or their sense of being valued. Perhaps itās triggering worries about their physical well-being if theyāve got caring responsibilities at home.
The emotion isnāt the problem ā itās valuable information about what matters to them.
And hereās what most leaders miss: when you try to avoid or shut down those emotions, when you push through with logic and policy, youāre actually making everything worse. Youāre teaching people that their needs donāt matter, that itās not safe to express how they really feel.
Thatās when trust breaks down completely.
Your job isnāt to eliminate emotion or talk them out of it. Your job is to acknowledge it, understand what need itās pointing to, and work with that information.
Using the COMPASS Model: Create Safety First
In my work with leaders, I use what I call the COMPASS Conversation Model for difficult conversations. The very first C stands for āCreate Safety.ā Thatās not fluffy stuff ā itās the absolute foundation that makes everything else possible.
Without safety, people shut down. With it, real conversations can happen.
So donāt lead with policy. Donāt open with justification.
Ground yourself first.
Iām serious about this. Take a few slow breaths. Check in with what emotion youāre carrying into this conversation.
If youāre frustrated, rushed, or already anxious about the outcome, that energy is going to leak out everywhere. You canāt hide it, no matter how professional you think youāre being.
Then, begin with curiosity instead of control.
Something like: āIāve been thinking about how we can rebuild connection in the team and make collaboration feel easier. Iād like to explore whether some in-office time might help with that ā but Iād really value hearing how that feels for you first.ā
Itās simple, but it shifts the entire dynamic immediately.
Youāre inviting a conversation, not dictating one.
Then ā and this is crucial ā name the fairness concern before they do.
āI know others are still remote, and this might feel unfair. I want us to talk about that too, because your view genuinely matters to me.ā
Youāve just turned potential defensiveness into actual dialogue.
Why Silence is Your Secret Weapon
So many leaders talk themselves out of trust without even realising theyāre doing it.
They fill every single gap in the conversation. They explain, justify, reassure, and repeat. All because silence feels uncomfortable.
But silence can be incredibly powerful when you know how to use it.
When you pause and let space exist in the conversation, youāre signalling something important: you want to understand, not just be understood.
That space allows people to express what theyāre really thinking, not just what they think you want to hear.
And in those moments? You often discover whatās actually driving the resistance. Fear of inconsistency. Worry about the workload. Concern that returning will be seen as some kind of punishment.
Active listening isnāt about nodding and waiting for your turn to speak.
Itās about genuine presence. Being comfortable with the pause. Thatās where trust actually builds.
Understanding Communication Styles with DiSC
And hereās something fascinating that most leaders donāt know: the way you deliver this message matters just as much as the message itself.
If youāve worked with DiSC profiles, youāll know what I mean. Someone with a D-style personality might actually respect the directness of āI need you in the office two days a week.ā They want the bottom line.
But an S-style person? They need reassurance that the relationship is staying intact. They need to know you still value them. Same message, completely different delivery.
Understanding these communication style differences changes absolutely everything about how these conversations land.
When the Conversation Gets Hot
Even with the best intentions, some conversations will heat up. Itās human nature.
And I need you to understand something fundamental here: when people get defensive or emotional, thatās not them being difficult. Thatās their amygdala ā the emotional part of their brain ā detecting a threat and jumping in before logic can catch up.
Heart rate rises. Breathing gets shallow. The thinking brain basically goes offline.
You cannot logic your way through someoneās amygdala reaction. You just canāt.
The answer isnāt to present more data, justify harder, or explain your position more clearly.
The answer is to help them regulate.
Your calm, grounded presence is what helps re-engage their thinking brain. Thatās not fluffy leadership stuff ā thatās actual neuroscience.
So if they get defensive ā āWhy me? Why not everyone?ā ā slow everything down.
Donāt counter straight away. Donāt explain. Donāt defend.
Say something like: āI can hear that this feels unfair to you. Help me understand what part feels hardest.ā
Youāve just invited honesty instead of an argument. Youāve acknowledged the emotion, which helps them start to regulate.
If they go silent, resist every urge to fill that space with words.
They might be processing. They might be trying not to cry. They might be working through their thoughts.
You could gently say: āI donāt want to push this if it feels too much right now. Would you like to pause and come back to it later?ā
If strong emotion rises ā anger, tears, frustration ā recognise it for what it is.
Thatās their brain signalling that something they need is under threat. Maybe itās autonomy. Maybe itās security. Maybe itās trust or respect or feeling valued.
The emotion is the messenger. Donāt shoot the messenger.
Give it time to settle. Sometimes five minutes of calm breathing together is way more productive than twenty minutes of pushing through.
And hereās something most leaders do that makes everything worse: they try to avoid the emotion. They change the subject, they minimise it, they say āitās not that badā or āyouāre overreacting.ā
When you do that, youāre teaching people that their feelings donāt matter, that itās not safe to be honest with you.
Thatās how you permanently lose trust.
The moment you stay grounded and acknowledge what theyāre feeling without trying to fix it or talk them out of it, you send a powerful message: Itās safe to stay in this conversation.
Thatās leadership in motion, right there.
What Fairness Actually Looks Like in Practice
When youāre leading change ā especially when it affects peopleās flexibility and autonomy ā fairness becomes one of your greatest currencies.
But itās also one of the easiest things to lose.
True fairness isnāt about sameness. Itās about transparency.
Itās explaining your reasoning clearly and listening openly to feedback.
Itās making sure people understand why a decision was made, how it was made, and that their perspective was genuinely heard in the process.
Even if they donāt agree with the outcome, most people can accept a decision when they feel respected throughout the process.
Itās when decisions come out of nowhere, or appear inconsistent, that fairness morphs into resentment faster than you can blink.
So if youāre asking one person to do something different from everyone else, be ready to show your working. Explain how you reached that decision. Invite feedback.
You donāt have to give away all your control, but you absolutely have to share context.
And hereās what nobody talks about enough: unfair return-to-office policies show up in places you might not be watching. Theyāre on Glassdoor. They come up in exit interviews. Theyāre discussed in your recruitment pipeline when candidates are deciding whether to accept your offer.
Word spreads fast when a workplace feels arbitrary or controlling. Your employer brand takes a hit thatās hard to recover from.
The cost of perceived unfairness isnāt just one unhappy employee. Itās the ripple effect across your entire team culture and your ability to attract and retain good people.
The Human Side of Hybrid Working
On forums like Reddit, managers are wrestling with this exact issue every single day.
Some say they desperately miss the buzz of the office.
Others are terrified of losing good people if they push too hard on returns.
And employees? Theyāre sharing how return discussions make them feel: controlled, excluded, undervalued, untrusted.
Itās a reminder that hybrid working isnāt just about flexibility or logistics.
Itās about identity.
Where people work ties directly into how much they feel trusted, respected, and genuinely seen as human beings.
When that gets disrupted, emotions flare. Fast.
Thatās why these conversations can never just be about logistics or desk space or collaboration.
Theyāre about belonging.
Theyāre about whether people feel they matter as much as the work they produce.
The Ripple Effect Youāre Creating
Every single interaction you have as a leader creates a ripple ā emotional, behavioural, cultural.
The tone you bring. The way you respond. The words you choose. All of it sends messages that echo way beyond that one conversation.
When you handle a tough discussion with genuine empathy, people remember the safety you gave them. They remember feeling heard.
When you react from frustration or rush through it, that feeling spreads too.
Thatās the ripple effect at play. Not in theory, but in every meeting, every one-to-one, every decision you make as a leader.
Leaders who truly understand this see culture completely differently.
They know that every single word either builds trust or chips away at it, piece by tiny piece.
Thatās the emotional reality of leadership that nobody talks about in management training.
And when you start to recognise it and work with it consciously, you become so much more intentional about the ripples youāre creating in your team.
The Science Beneath the Calm
When people say, āI know itās not personal ā but it feels personal,ā theyāre absolutely right.
Thatās their brain responding exactly as itās wired to respond.
When we perceive a threat ā real or imagined ā our emotional brain, the amygdala, jumps in before logic can catch up. Heart rate rises. Breath shortens. Rational thinking shuts down completely.
You canāt logic your way through someoneās amygdala reaction. You just canāt.
The answer isnāt to over-explain or present more data or justify harder.
The answer is to regulate.
Your calm tone and grounded presence help re-engage their thinking brain. Thatās not fluffy leadership stuff ā thatās neuroscience.
This is why emotional intelligence isnāt a soft skill. Itās the actual science of leading human beings effectively.
The more emotionally aware you become, the more stable your conversations are. The more trust you build. The more respect you earn.
And thatās exactly what your team notices most about you.
What Happens After The Conversation
Hereās something most leaders get wrong: they think the conversation ends when you both stand up from the table.
It doesnāt.
Check in within 24-48 hours. A simple message or quick chat: āHow are you feeling about our conversation yesterday?ā
This isnāt about checking theyāre āover itā or that theyāve accepted your decision.
Itās about showing you care about them as a person, not just about getting the outcome you wanted.
And hereās whatās really happening when you do this: youāre showing them that their emotional response mattered. That the need they expressed ā whether it was for autonomy, security, trust, whatever it was ā you heard it. Youāre still thinking about it.
This follow-up is where trust actually deepens. Itās where people see that youāre not just going through the motions of ādoing leadership properly.ā You genuinely care.
Because the truth is, if youāve had a conversation where someone expressed real emotion about an unmet need, theyāre probably still processing it. They might have thought of things they wished theyād said. They might be feeling vulnerable or exposed for having shown you how they really feel.
When you reach back out, youāre saying, āItās still safe. Iām still here. This matters.ā
Thatās the kind of leadership that builds loyalty.
Building Fairness One Conversation at a Time
Every leader I know wants to be fair. Thatās not the issue.
But fairness isnāt a one-time act that you tick off a list. Itās a daily practice.
Itās shown through small, consistent choices:
Inviting someone to share their perspective before making a change that affects them.
Acknowledging their emotion instead of defending your position.
Checking in after a tough discussion to genuinely see how theyāre feeling.
Being willing to adapt if something truly isnāt working.
Those moments build long-term trust in your leadership. And trust ā not authority, not your job title ā is what keeps people genuinely engaged in their work and committed to your team.
Final Thoughts
If youāre leading through this right now, youāre not alone in finding this tricky. I promise you that.
Nobodyās leading in the same landscape they started in. The ground keeps shifting underneath us ā expectations, working styles, what people need from their leaders.
But if you can stay anchored in fairness, curiosity, and emotional awareness, youāll not only manage the return to workplace conversation well ā youāll actually strengthen your teamās trust in you through it.
Because hereās the truth: people donāt remember the policy you implemented.
They remember how you made them feel during the change.
This is exactly the kind of situation I help leaders work through in my Conversation Catalyst sessions.
We work on how to prepare yourself emotionally for charged conversations, recognising when a discussion is veering off track and what to do about it, staying calm and regulated when others arenāt, leading with fairness while still moving things forward, and turning tension into trust and genuine collaboration.
Because leading people back into the workplace isnāt really about where they sit or which days they come in.
Itās about how they feel when they get there. How safe they feel. How valued. How seen.
And when you lead those conversations with empathy, clarity, and courage, you donāt just bring people back into the office.
You restore their trust in you as their leader.
If you want to discuss how to handle these conversations on your team, my DMs are always open. You can find me on LinkedIn or visit my website at thepeoplementor.co.uk.
Thatās all from todayās podcast. I hope itās given you some food for thought and made some of those difficult conversations youāve been dreading feel a bit easier.
Take care, and Iāll see you next time.
Need more support? Look at the free resources here.